3 days popular7 days popular1 month popular3 months popular

Determining the best time of year for malaria interventions in Africa

New methods for analysing malaria transmission can estimate the best time of year to carry out campaigns such as mass drug treatment and spraying of houses with insecticide.

In a study published in , of uses methods that calculate the effect of interventions against when conditions change seasonally.

The study finds that for malaria in Africa the best time of year for mass drug administration is in the low season, whereas the best time for house spraying, or a vaccine that reduces infection rates, is just before the high season.

An important summary of the dynamics of an is the , defined as the average number of secondary infections that would result from each infection if everyone were susceptible. The study’s author shows how to find the , and the number’s change due to interventions when the disease has seasonal variation or the intervention effects change over time.

It has been estimated that in some parts of Africa the reproduction number needs to be reduced over 1000-fold in order to locally eliminate malaria. The results of this study can help us to understand how to optimally combine existing interventions. The methods may be applied to novel control measures to assess what contribution they could make to the large reductions in transmission that are needed.

Source

All works published in PLOS Computational Biology are Open Access, which means that all content is immediately and freely available.

Citation: Griffin JT (2015) The Interaction between Seasonality and Pulsed Interventions against Malaria in Their Effects on the Reproduction Number. PLoS Comput Biol 11(1): e1004057. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004057

Funding: The work was funded by a fellowship from the UK Medical Research Council, grant number G1002284. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/index.htm. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

PLOS