A new NPR/Robert Wood Johnson Foundation/Harvard School of Public Health poll just released on the views of Latinos in America about their health and health care, communities, financial situation, and discrimination in their lives. The poll found that Latinos see diabetes as the biggest health problem for their own families.
Nearly one in five (19%) Latinos said diabetes is the biggest health problem facing their families. The next most cited problem, cancer, is mentioned by just one in twenty Latinos (5%). Diabetes was the biggest health problem reported by both immigrant (16%) and non-immigrant Latinos (22%).
“These findings are surprising,” said Robert J. Blendon, Sc.D., Richard L. Menschel Professor of Health Policy and Political Analysis at the Harvard School of Public Health. “Previous polls have shown that Latinos see cancer as the most important health problem facing the country. But when asked about their own families, Latinos cite diabetes as the biggest problem.”
The poll reports on the views and experiences of all Latinos, as well as six separate Latino groups: those of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican, South American and Central American heritage. This focus allows examination of the results by different Latino heritage groups. Also, the poll examines the views of Latinos born in the United States and those born in other countries.
Researchers have long cited diabetes as a threat for the nation’s Latino population. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hispanic adults are 1.7 times more likely than non-Hispanic white adults to have been diagnosed with diabetes by a physician, and 1.5 times more likely to die from diabetes.
Prior studies have shown that obesity rates among immigrants increase as their duration of residence in the U.S. increases, and suggest that this may be attributable in part to changes in lifestyle, including unhealthy diet. However, the poll suggests that Latino immigrants generally do not perceive their diets as less healthy in the U.S. About four in ten (38%) immigrants said their diet is healthier in the United States, and about the same number (39%) sees their diet about as healthy. Only one in five (21%) see their diet as less healthy. Cuban immigrants are significantly more likely to see their diet as more healthy in the U.S. (60%) than are immigrants of Dominican (37%), Mexican (36%), or South American (21%) heritage.
Among Latinos who have received medical care during the past twelve months, about one in five (19%) rate the health services they received as fair or poor. Among Latino groups, those reporting care was fair or poor range from 24% among Latinos of Mexican heritage to 7% among those of Cuban ancestry.
Over half of all Latinos (52%) are not confident that they would have enough money or health insurance to pay for a major illness.
When asked to rate aspects of their communities, significant numbers of total Latinos give low ratings in several areas. Four in ten Latinos (40%) report that the quality of available housing in the area where they live is fair or poor. Over a third of all Latinos rate the public transportation system (36%), availability of recreational facilities for exercise and sports (36%), and safety from crime (34%) in their communities as fair or poor. Three in ten rate the cleanliness of the streets and maintenance of public areas as fair or poor (30%), and about one in four rate the availability of preventive services (27%) and the quality of emergency services, such as police, fire, and ambulance (23%), as fair or poor.
Among Latino groups, there is some variation in evaluation of different aspects of their communities. For example, fair or poor rating for the cleanliness of the streets and maintenance of public areas ranged from 19% among Latinos of Cuban heritage to 39% among those of Puerto Rican ancestry, while fair or poor ratings for the quality of emergency services ranged from 8% among Latinos of Cuban ancestry to 26% among those of Mexican heritage.
This poll is part of an ongoing series of surveys developed by researchers at the Harvard Opinion Research Program (HORP) at the Harvard School of Public Health in partnership with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and NPR. The research team consists of the following members at each institution.
Harvard School of Public Health: Robert J. Blendon, Professor of Health Policy and Political Analysis and Executive Director of HORP; John M. Benson, Research Scientist and Managing Director of HORP; Kathleen J. Weldon, Research and Administrative Manager.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: Fred Mann, Associate Vice President, Communications; Carolyn Miller, Senior Program Officer, Research and Evaluation; and Ari Kramer, Communications Officer.
NPR: Anne Gudenkauf, Senior Supervising Editor, Science Desk; Joe Neel, Deputy Senior Supervising Editor, Science Desk; Steve Drummond, Senior Supervising Editor, National Desk; Vickie Walton-James, Deputy Senior Supervising Editor, National Desk; Luis Clemens, Senior Editor, Code Switch; Matt Thompson, Editorial Product Manager.
In addition, Debra Joy Perez, who was at the time Assistant Vice President, Research and Evaluation, at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, was part of the research team.
Interviews were conducted via telephone (including both landline and cell phone) by SSRS of Media (PA), June 11 – July 14, 2013, among a nationally representative sample of 1478 Latinos age 18 and older. The interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. The margin of error for total respondents is +/- 3.7 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Respondents were first screened by asking if they were of Hispanic or Latino descent. If they were, they were then asked their and their family’s heritage. Oversamples were conducted with Latino groups of Puerto Rican, Cuban, and Dominican heritage in order to make analysis by those groups possible. The groups by heritage were weighted to their actual proportion of Latino adults nationwide. Respondents were also asked if they were born in the U.S., the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or another country. Those who were born in the United States or Puerto Rico were considered “non-immigrants;” those born in another country were considered “immigrants.”
Number of interviews/Margin of error (percentage points)
Total Latinos 1478 ±3.7
- Immigrants 865 ±5.0
- Non-immigrants 612 ±5.7
- Mexican 644 ±5.1
- Puerto Rican 215 ±9.7
- Cuban 206 ±10.9
- Dominican 100 ±13.8
- South American 113 ±13.2
- Central American 146 ±11.1
Possible sources of non-sampling error include non-response bias, as well as question wording and ordering effects. Non-response in telephone surveys produces some known biases in survey-derived estimates because participation tends to vary for different subgroups of the population. To compensate for these known biases and for variations in probability of selection within and across households, sample data are weighted by household size, cell phone/landline use and demographics (sex, age, education, marital status and census region) to reflect the true population. Other techniques, including random-digit dialing, replicate subsamples, and systematic respondent selection within households, are used to ensure that the sample is representative.