3 days popular7 days popular1 month popular3 months popular

Enrollment Of Kids In Health-Care Programs Boosted By Increasing Federal Match Funds For States

Significantly more children get after increases in federal matching funds to states for and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), according to new research from the University of Michigan.

The research, published in the journal Health Affairs, showed that a 10-percentage-point increase in the federal match for Medicaid and CHIP, similar to the increase that occurred with the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act, is associated with an increase of 1.9 percent in the number of children enrolled in Medicaid nationwide, or approximately 500,000 additional children.

“Throughout the past decade, Medicaid and CHIP enrollment for children has increased, while the level of uninsurance has decreased. Our study suggests that these combined federal and state programs have succeeded in providing health insurance coverage for children, even as the number of children in poor and low-income families has increased,” says , M.D., M.P.H., M.S., the study’s lead author and a neonatal-perinatal medicine fellow in the Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases at C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital at the University of Michigan.

Patrick is a 2010-12 at the University of Michigan.

“Medicaid and CHIP work as a partnership between states and the federal government that benefits children,” says , M.D., M.A.P.P., associate professor in the Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit and the Division of General Medicine at the U-M Medical School and associate professor of public policy at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy.

“We found a strong relationship between the federal share of funding, called the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, and Medicaid enrollment for children over the past decade,” says Davis, who is senior author on the paper.

“Congress can change the federal match at any time, and they have increased the match to help states during tough economic times,” explains Davis. “The match was increased during our recent recession, but returned to previous levels in June 2011. We found that changes in FMAP are associated with significant changes in children’s through Medicaid and CHIP, even after accounting for state-level factors such as government revenues and proportion of children living in poverty.”

It is not yet clear what effect the federal match decrease in 2011 will have on children’s health care coverage.

“When states receive reduced federal funds for Medicaid, they may be forced to limit their outreach to enroll eligible children, restrict optional benefits, or otherwise reduce activities in their Medicaid programs that they might pursue,” Patrick says. “It is clear from decades of research that children with coverage have better access to timely health care than children without coverage.

“The fact that it requires an act of Congress to respond to states’ economic downturns through the federal match mechanism suggests that the match needs to be modernized,” says Patrick.

The researchers analyzed publicly available data from all 50 states from 1999 to 2009.

Source

Journal citation: doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0988 HEALTH AFFAIRS 31, NO. 8 (2012)
Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program.
Additional author: From the University of Michigan: Hwajung Choi, research analyst, Department of Internal Medicine.
University of Michigan Health System