3 days popular7 days popular1 month popular3 months popular

For Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement, 2 Venous Punctures Not Always Needed

One venous puncture, rather than two, is a safe and effective approach to intravascular ultrasound-guided placement in critically-ill , a new study shows. placement is done to prevent or treat pulmonary emboli or .

“The majority of institutions use a dual venous puncture technique, while we use a single venous puncture technique,” said Dr. , of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. “We were interested to know if the different approaches affected technical success, clinical success or the rate of complications with the procedure,” said.

In a study of 99 patients, the single puncture technique was technically successful in almost 94% of cases, which is comparable to the dual puncture approach, said Dr. Gunn. The rate for deep venous thrombosis at the venous access site was 2%. This compares to approximately 4% with the double puncture approach, he said.

Dr. Gunn noted that contrast venography is the most common method employed for guiding inferior vena cava filter placement; however, intravascular ultrasound-guided placement is particularly useful in treating critically , patients who have contrast allergies as well as those who have compromised renal function.

“Intravascular ultrasound-guided placement can be done at the patient’s bedside, eliminating the need for time-consuming and often difficult patient transport,” he said. About 41% of the inferior vena cava filter placements were done at the bedside. “The filter was slightly more likely to be malpositioned if the procedure was done at the patient’s bedside,” Dr. Gunn added.

Source

Dr. Gunn presented his study at the ARRS annual meeting on April 19 in Washington, DC.
American Roentgen Ray Society