3 days popular7 days popular1 month popular3 months popular

Inovio’s CELLECTRA® Electroporation Delivery Technology Powers Durable, Best-In-Class T-Cell Responses From HIV Vaccine In Human Study

Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NYSE MKT: INO) has announced the peer-reviewed publication of results from two phase I trials (HVTN 070 and HVTN 080) of its PENNVAX®-B preventive HIV DNA vaccine delivered with a DNA adjuvant and with or without ’s proprietary CELLECTRA® electroporation delivery device. The studies were conducted by the Trials Network (HVTN). Inovio’s HIV DNA vaccine together with the CELLECTRA device significantly increased the number of responders producing robust and durable CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses in humans. The observation of robust T-cell responses against distinct targeted diseases generated by different Inovio SynCon® DNA vaccines delivered using CELLECTRA electroporation technology have now been published in two respected peer-reviewed journals. These results are compelling because T-cells are considered critical to fighting cancers and chronic infectious diseases.

While Inovio previously released preliminary data from these two trials, this comparison and durability data was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Infectious Diseases in the article, “Safety and comparative immunogenicity of an HIV-1 DNA vaccine in combination with plasmid IL-12 and impact of intramuscular electroporation for delivery.” The lead author was Dr. Spyros Kalams, who is Associate Professor of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and principal investigator of Vanderbilt’s HIV Vaccine Trials Unit for both clinical studies.

Robust T-cell responses were generated in 89% of the subjects that received three vaccinations of PENNVAX-B, which consists of 1 mg of each of three DNA plasmids (encoding for HIV gag, pol, and env proteins) along with 1 mg of IL-12 DNA plasmid, followed by intramuscular electroporation with Inovio’s CELLECTRA device. Three or four vaccinations with a 2 mg dose of each PENNVAX-B plasmid plus 1.5 mg of IL-12 DNA generated fewer responses when delivered without electroporation.

Comparative T-Cell Response Rates:

PENNVAX-B Plus DNA IL-12 With and Without CELLECTRA Electroporation (EP)

Regimen CD4 CD8
Half dose, 3 vaccinations, with EP 80.8% (21/26) 51.9% (14/27)
Full dose, 3 vaccinations, without EP 19.2% (5/26) 6.9% (2/29)
Full dose, 4 vaccinations, without EP 40.7% (11/27) 3.6% (1/28)

Notably, using only half the vaccine dose, and only three doses as compared to four, CELLECTRA electroporation generated a 45% point increase (7% to 52%) in the generation of CD8 T-cells compared to the subjects that received a full dose without electroporation. In the three-vaccination regimen with electroporation, 88.9% (24/27) of subjects developed a robust CD4 or CD8 response. Six months after vaccination, T-cell response rates remained strong and persistent in the subjects that received only three doses delivered by CELLECTRA EP. Of 24 positive CD4 or CD8 T-cell responders following the third and last vaccination in month 3, 79% (19/24) showed persistent CD4 or CD8 T-cell responses at month 9. There were no safety issues observed when Inovio’s DNA vaccine for HIV was co-administered with IL-12 DNA and delivered using electroporation with CELLECTRA.

CD4 and CD8 T-cells are both important in cellular immunity, however, CD8 T-cells are considered especially integral to fighting cancers and chronic infectious diseases. Achieving a robust CD8 T-cell response in a significant number of patients, i.e. a significant response rate, has been a particular challenge for HIV researchers. In this study, PENNVAX-B generated CD8 T-cell responses with significant magnitude (as measured by the validated HVTN assay).

In other study arms that did not achieve statistical significance, the use of IL-12 DNA appeared to positively impact T-cell response rates. The increased response rate only occurred when IL-12 DNA was delivered with electroporation. This effect may be further investigated in future studies of Inovio DNA vaccines delivered with electroporation.

Dr. J. Joseph Kim, Inovio’s President and CEO, said, “This is the second major scientific journal to publish clinical papers demonstrating our best-in-class T-cell responses from two of Inovio’s product candidates in two different disease indications.

“This proof-of-concept data highlights not only the robust HIV-specific T-cell production achievable with next-generation vaccine technology, but clearly defines in a human comparison study the very significant impact of our CELLECTRA electroporation technology in increasing targeted immune responses – with a dose sparing benefit and excellent safety outcomes to date. The difference in T-cell generation is striking and will benefit the further development of our transformative DNA vaccines to treat and prevent HIV infection and other diseases. We have incorporated this knowledge from the single-clade PENNVAX-B program into the design of our multi-clade PENNVAX®-GP vaccine, which is now our lead preventive and therapeutic vaccine that broadly targets global HIV strains, and look forward to initiating our first human study of this vaccine later this year. PENNVAX-GP was developed through a $25 million contract with the NIAID; the clinical study of PENNVAX-GP will also be conducted by the HVTN.”

Inovio’s patented CELLECTRA electroporation delivery technology uses controlled, millisecond electrical pulses to create temporary pores in the cell membrane and allow significant cellular uptake of a synthetic DNA vaccine previously injected into muscle or skin. This technique has been shown to increase gene expression of the encoded “antigen” by as much as 1000-fold compared to vaccination without electroporation.

Inovio’s cutting-edge DNA and electroporation technology also avoids issues that have plagued some other vaccine platforms: for example, researchers have observed that some vector-based vaccines may be associated with the lessening of immune responses driven by vaccination.

The two HIV phase I trials, HVTN 070 (without electroporation; n=120 patients); and 080 (with electroporation; n=48 patients); were multicenter, randomized, clinical trials. The studies were sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), an agency of the National Institutes of Health, and conducted by the NIAID-funded HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) at several clinical sites.

Source

Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc