3 days popular7 days popular1 month popular3 months popular

New method identifies genome-wide off-target cleavage sites of CRISPR-Cas nucleases

Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) investigators have developed a method of detecting, across the entire genome of , unwanted DNA breaks induced by use of the popular gene-editing tools called RNA-guided nucleases (RGNs). Members of the same team that first described these off-target effects in human cells describe their new platform, called Genome-wide Unbiased Indentification of Evaluated by Sequencing (GUIDE-seq), in a report being published online in .

“GUIDE-seq is the first genome-wide method of sensitively detecting off-target DNA breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases that does not start with the assumption that these off-target sites resemble the targeted sites,” says , MD, PhD, associate chief for Research in the MGH Department of Pathology and senior author of the report. “This capability, which did not exist before, is critically important for the evaluation of any clinical use of CRISPR-Cas RGNs.”

Used to cut through a double strand of DNA in order to introduce genetic changes, CRISPR-Cas RGNs combine a bacterial gene-cutting enzyme called Cas9 with a short RNA segment that matches and binds to the target DNA sequence. In a 2013 Nature Biotechnology paper, Joung and his colleagues reported finding that CRISPR-Cas RGNs could also induce double-strand breaks (DSBs) at sites with significant differences from the target site, including mismatches of as many as five nucleotides. Since such off-target mutations could potentially lead to adverse effects, including cancer, the ability to identify and eventually minimize unwanted DSBs would be essential to the safe clinical use of these RGNs, the authors note.

The method they developed involves use of short, double-stranded oligonucleotides that are taken up by DSBs in a cell’s DNA, acting as markers of off-target breaks caused by the use of CRISPR-Cas. Those tags allow the identification and subsequent sequencing of those genomic regions, pinpointing the location of off-target mutations. Experiments with GUIDE-seq showed it was sensitive enough to detect off-target sites at which CRISPR RGNs induced unwanted mutations of a gene that occur with a frequency of as little as 0.1 percent in a population of cells. These experiments also revealed that, since many such mutations took place at sites quite dissimilar from the targeted site, no easy rules would predict the number or location of off-target DSBs.

Two existing tools designed to predict off-target mutations by analysis of the target sequence were much less effective than GUIDE-seq in predicting confirmed off-target sites and also misidentified sites that did not prove to have been cut by the enzyme. Comparing GUIDE-seq with a tool called ChIP-seq – which identifies sites where proteins bind to a DNA strand – confirmed that ChIP-seq does not provide a robust method for identifying CRISPR-Cas-induced DSBs.

GUIDE-seq was also able to identify breakpoint hotspots in control cell lines that were not induced to express the CRISPR RGNs. “Various papers have described fragile genomic sites in human cells before,” Joung notes, “but this method may be the first to identify these sites without the addition of drugs that enhance the occurrence of such breaks. We also were surprised to find those breaks occurred largely at different sites in the two cell lines used in this study. The ability to capture these RGN-independent breaks suggests that GUIDE-seq could be a useful tool for studying and monitoring DNA repair in living cells.”

In addition, GUIDE-seq was able to verify that an MGH-developed approach for improving the accuracy of CRISPR-Cas by shortening the guiding RNA segment reduced the number of DSBs throughout the genome. Joung also expects that GUIDE-seq will be useful in identifying off-target breaks induced by other gene-editing tools. Along with pursuing that possibility, he notes the importance of investigating the incidence and detection of off-target mutations in human cells not altered to create cell lines – a process that transforms them into immortalized cancer cells. Understanding the range and number of off-target mutations in untransformed cells will give a better picture of how CRISPR-Cas RGNs and other tools would function in clinical applications.

“The GUIDE-seq method is very straightforward to perform, and we intend to make the software for analyzing sequencing data available online to non-commercial researchers at http://www.jounglab.org/guideseqin the near future,” adds Joung, who is an associate professor of Pathology at Harvard Medical School. A patent application covering the GUIDE-seq technology has been filed.


Co-lead authors of the Nature Biotechnology report are Shengdar Tsai, PhD, and Zongli Zheng, PhD, of the MGH Molecular Pathology Unit. Additional co-authors are Nhu Nguyen, Matthew Liebers, Ved Topkar, Vishal Thapar, PhD, Nicolas Wyvekens, Cyd Khayter, John Iafrate, MD, PhD, Long Le, MD, PhD, and Martin Aryee, PhD, all of MGH Pathology. Support for the study includes National Institutes of Health Director’s Pioneer Award DP1 GM105378; NIH grants R01 GM088040, R01 AR063070 and F32 GM105189; the Jim and Ann Orr MGH Research Scholar Award, and Defense Advanced Research Project Agency grant W911NF-11-2-0056.

Massachusetts General Hospital