3 days popular7 days popular1 month popular3 months popular

Psychotherapy of depression saves costs

In the current issue of and Psychosomatics a group of German investigators analyzes whether to treat with psychotherapy is worth the cost. (MDD) causes a massive disease burden worldwide. (CBT) is an important treatment approach for . Cost-utility analysis () is a method to support decisions on efficient allocation of resources in health policy. The objective of our study was to systematically review of CBT in the treatment of patients suffering from MDD.

The Authors conducted a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) to identify CUA of CBT for MDD. Cost data were inflated to the year 2011 and converted into USD using purchasing power parities (USD PPP) to ensure comparability of the data. Quality assessment of CUA was performed. Twenty-two studies were included in this systematic review.

Overall, results showed that no study employed a time horizon of more than 5 years. In most studies, individual and group CBT as well as CBT for maintenance showed acceptable incremental cost-utility ratios (<50,000 USD PPP/quality-adjusted life year).

The CUA results of CBT for children and adolescents and of computerized CBT were inconsistent. Discussion: We found consistent evidence that individualized CBT is cost-effective from the perspective of a third-party payer for short-term treatment and for relapse prevention of MDD in the adult population.

Research: Cost-Utility Analyses of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy of Depression: A Systematic Review, Brettschneider C., Djadran H., Härter M., Löwe B., Riedel-Heller S., König H.-H., Journal of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, DOI:10.1159/000365150, published January 2015.

Source

Source: Journal of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics